 Selective array building at structure tunnels |
|
|
|
|
Tags |
(This content has not been tagged yet)
|
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 ·
 |
 May 5 2008, 07:02 AM
Post
#1
|
|||
 Confucius say: Crowded elevator always smell different to midget   Admin  Posts: 2367 Joined: 13-October 02 From: Planet Earth Member No.: 2 Using LabVIEW Since:1994 LV:8.5 ,8.2.1 ,7.1.1 
My Blog
My Gallery
 |
why does a 1D array always become a 2D on for loop borders? Why can't we concatenate a 1D array at the border. It seems that tunnel has the potential to do a lot more than it can right now in regards to array manipulation.
Reason for edit: Moved post to a new thread due to hijack, deleted irrelevant text that referred to old thread.
--------------------
|
||
 |
 
|
||
| Ad |
May 5 2008, 07:02 AM
Post
#
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 5 2008, 07:58 AM
Post
#2
|
|||
 1 more post to go! Member Posts: 9 Joined: 12-January 07 From: Randers Member No.: 7489 Using LabVIEW Since:1997 LV:6.1 ,8.20 ,. 
|
QUOTE (Michael_Aivaliotis @ May 5 2008, 09:02 AM)  I like this idea. Along the same lines (or maybe this is hijacking), why does a 1D array always become a 2D on for loop borders? Why can't we concatenate a 1D array at the border. It seems that tunnel has the potential to do a lot more than it can right now in regards to array manipulation. I can't se the picture of what you are talking about. What is wrong ? regards Bjarne
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 5 2008, 01:46 PM
Post
#3
|
|||
 I'm a LAVA, not a fighter. V I Engineering, Inc.  Posts: 3759 Joined: 13-October 03 From: Michigan, USA Member No.: 181 Using LabVIEW Since:1993 LV:8.5 ,. ,. 
My Blog
|
QUOTE (Michael_Aivaliotis @ May 5 2008, 03:02 AM) why does a 1D array always become a 2D on for loop borders? Why can't we concatenate a 1D array at the border. It seems that tunnel has the potential to do a lot more than it can right now in regards to array manipulation. I also can't see a picture about what you're talking about, but I agree. If this is implimented, we need to consider making it obvious at the tunnel that this is happening (of course), and there's not much real estate on of those little nodes - it'll be quite a challenge for the NI design team 
-------------------- 
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 5 2008, 02:14 PM
Post
#4
|
||||
 Changing the world, one VI at a time. JKI  Posts: 1700 Joined: 22-October 02 From: San Francisco, CA Member No.: 17 Using LabVIEW Since:1995 LV:8.2.1 ,8.5 ,7.1.1
My Blog
My Gallery
|
This is what Michael's talking about:
Notes:
--------------------
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
| |
May 6 2008, 09:16 PM
Post
#5
|
|||
 Extremely Active Premium Member  Posts: 535 Joined: 18-October 05 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 3266 Using LabVIEW Since:2005 LV:8.6 ,8.5.1 ,7.1.1
My Blog
|
I love it!
A simple right-click:concatenate option on the exit tunnel (like the "build array" primative, which is basically the extra code you're trying to eliminate, right?) would be very nice here. I don't see why this would have to be limited to just 1D outputs though. I can see cases with 2D arrays inside a For loop where I would want to concatenate vs. build a 3D array as well. --------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
May 7 2008, 07:28 PM
Post
#6
|
|||
 Extwemely Active Premium Member Posts: 1634 Joined: 23-January 05 From: Here Member No.: 1431 Using LabVIEW Since:2003 LV:8.6 ,7.0 ,. 
|
I wanted something like this for a long time as well.
QUOTE (Jim Kring @ May 5 2008, 05:14 PM) This should also work for strings  If you're refering to concatenating different strings into a single one, you can sort of do that - build them into an array and then concatenate the array: 
-------------------- More than meets the eye...
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
| Time is now: 3rd December 2008 - 08:59 AM |