Visit our LabVIEW Wiki Hardware Portal
Tags |
(This content has not been tagged yet)
|
![]() |
Jun 13 2007, 02:07 PM
Post
#1
|
|||
![]() Very Active Member Posts: 187 Joined: 30-January 04 From: Oakville, Ontario Member No.: 247 Using LabVIEW Since:2002 LV:8.5.1 ,8.5 ,7.1
|
I'd like to know the opinions of other integrators; Is there any reason to choose the PCI-6221 over the USB-6221?
In our particular case, the USB platform seems to be the better way to go. But there is some concern that even though the acquisition rates are reported as being the same, there may be some drawbacks to choosing the USB bus over the PCI. Could we end up seeing delays or "missed" data with the USB? What experiences have you had in the field with USB based acquisition? Your opinions are greatly appreciated.
|
||
|
|
|||
| Ad |
Jun 13 2007, 02:07 PM
Post
#
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
Jun 13 2007, 03:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|||
![]() CCT It Premium Member ![]() Posts: 1393 Joined: 13-June 05 From: Woerden, Netherlands Member No.: 2399 Using LabVIEW Since:2001 LV:8.5.1 ,6.1 ,8.2.1
My Blog
My Gallery
|
What experiences have you had in the field with USB based acquisition? None, but I have some experience in the lab, were a USB 6221 took quite some time to get started with analog output (3-4 seconds) vs. semingly direct on PCI. Ton --------------------
|
||
|
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
| Time is now: 8th January 2009 - 10:56 PM |